PreviousNext
Page 43
Previous/Next Page
Technology in Australia 1788-1988Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering
----------
Table of Contents

Chapter 1

I Groping In A Strange Environment: 1788-1851

II Farmers Take The Initiative: 1851-1888

III Enter Education And Science: 1888-1927

IV Agricultural Science Pays Dividends: 1927-1987

V Examples Of Research And Development 1928-1988
i Land assessment
ii Improving the environment
iii Adapting to the environment
iv Improving farm management

VI International Aspects Of Agricultural Research

VII Future Prospects

VIII Acknowledgements

References

Index
Search
Help

Contact us
Trace element research (continued)

Publication of the original cobalt studies was closely followed by reports from Western Australia[69] of copper deficient pastures which occurred on sandy soils, particularly along the coast. Sheep and cattle grazing these areas suffered from a variety of pathological conditions known as enzootic ataxia (swayback), 'steely wool', and 'falling disease'. Heavy losses were reported in many areas and it took the combined efforts of CSIRO, State Departments and universities to unravel a complex situation in which grazing animals could suffer from too little or too much copper, depending on their associated intakes of molybdenum and inorganic sulphate.

More recently research has provided an understanding of the important roles of sulphur, zinc and selenium in animal nutrition and areas of marginal deficiencies of these elements have been identified.

Australian research on the importance of trace elements in plant and animal nutrition has resulted in enormous benefits to the Australian community in terms of increased and cheaper productivity, and large areas of inherent low fertility have been converted to prosperous farmland (e.g. the change in South Australia of the 'ninety mile desert' to 'Coonalpyn Downs'). At the same time this research has had important world-wide significance and has established Australia as an international leader in this field.[70]

Pest and disease control

Some experimental studies, often conducted by a single scientist or team of scientists, have led to major discoveries, such as the identification and control of a particular predator, pest, weed, or plant or animal disease. For example, in 1935 the work of Dr. H. R. Angell[71] was notable in drawing attention to the fungistatic properties of the vapours of certain hydrocarbons in controlling downy mildew of tobacco in covered seed beds. This finding was not only a boon to Australian tobacco growers, but also Angell's method, with modifications, was adopted world wide.

Techniques have been developed, or are now being developed for controlling a wide range of insects, including cattle ticks, Australian Plague locusts, the Sirex wasp, the potato moth and cock chafer grubs, all of which cause losses of importance. Similarly, such studies as those of I. W. Beveridge on the aetiology and control of footrot, L. B. Bull on mycotic dermatitis, H. E. Albiston and A. W. Turner on black disease, and W. Mules on the control of blow fly strike have all yielded great benefits to the sheep industry.

In many instances measures for the control of pests, parasites, predators, weeds and diseases have been based on the use of chemicals (insecticides and weedicides), poisons or vaccines which, for the most part, have been developed overseas. The possibilities of using methods of biological control, however, have long been of interest to Australian scientists and they have reported some outstanding successes.

The first of these successes resulted from the combined efforts of the Commonwealth Government and the Governments of Queensland and New South Wales which, in 1919, together constituted a Commonwealth Prickly Pear Board. At that time some six species of the prickly pear cactus (Opuntia sp.), which had originally been introduced from South Africa, had infested some 10.5 million hectares in the grazing and farming areas of South-Eastern Queensland and northern New South Wales. The cactus was estimated to be spreading at a rate of about 0.5 million hectares a year. Various mechanical methods of destroying the plant had been tried without success and, although poisoning with arsenical compounds certainly killed the plant, this was too hazardous and expensive a method to use on a large scale.


Organisations in Australian Science at Work - Commonwealth Prickly Pear Board

People in Bright Sparcs - Albiston, H. E.; Angell, Dr H. R.; Beveridge, I. W.; Bull, L. B; Filmer, J. F.; Marston, Hedley; Mules, W.; Underwood, E. J.

Previous Page Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering Next Page


© 1988 Print Edition pages 37 - 38, Online Edition 2000
Published by Australian Science and Technology Heritage Centre, using the Web Academic Resource Publisher
http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/tia/043.html